+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 1B vs Phi 4 Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning leads with 40.3% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Phi 4 Reasoning is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B was created as an ultra-lightweight open-source model, designed to enable AI capabilities on devices with limited resources. Built with just 1 billion parameters while maintaining instruction-following abilities, it serves edge computing, mobile applications, and scenarios where minimal footprint is essential.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended analytical thinking into the Phi-4 architecture, designed to spend more time on complex problem-solving. Built to combine compact model efficiency with reasoning depth, it represents Microsoft's exploration of thoughtful small models.
1 month newer
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:29.0%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:69.3%(+40.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:29.0%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:69.3%(+40.3%)
Providers:0