+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 1B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads with 27.5% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B was created as an ultra-lightweight open-source model, designed to enable AI capabilities on devices with limited resources. Built with just 1 billion parameters while maintaining instruction-following abilities, it serves edge computing, mobile applications, and scenarios where minimal footprint is essential.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 7B was created as an efficient instruction-tuned model, designed to provide capable performance with just 7 billion parameters. Built for applications requiring reliable language understanding with minimal computational overhead, it serves as an accessible entry point to the Qwen 2.5 family.
5 months newer
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 8 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:37.9%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Average Score:65.5%(+27.5%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
1 providers
Together
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:37.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Avg Score:65.5%(+27.5%)
Providers:1