+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 1B vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct leads with 34.8% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Overall, Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B was created as an ultra-lightweight open-source model, designed to enable AI capabilities on devices with limited resources. Built with just 1 billion parameters while maintaining instruction-following abilities, it serves edge computing, mobile applications, and scenarios where minimal footprint is essential.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B was developed as a specialized coding model, designed to excel at programming tasks with 32 billion parameters specifically optimized for code. Built to understand and generate code across multiple programming languages, it serves developers requiring advanced code completion, debugging, and explanation capabilities.
5 months newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:34.0%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Average Score:68.8%(+34.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
4 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:34.0%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Avg Score:68.8%(+34.8%)
Providers:4