+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 1B vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B leads with 28.1% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B was created as an ultra-lightweight open-source model, designed to enable AI capabilities on devices with limited resources. Built with just 1 billion parameters while maintaining instruction-following abilities, it serves edge computing, mobile applications, and scenarios where minimal footprint is essential.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni 7B was created as a multimodal model supporting text, audio, and other modalities, designed to provide integrated understanding across diverse input types. Built with 7 billion parameters for efficient omni-modal processing, it extends AI capabilities beyond traditional text-only or vision-language boundaries.
15 days newer
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-27
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:36.9%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Average Score:65.0%(+28.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:36.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Avg Score:65.0%(+28.1%)
Providers:0