+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 27B vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 12.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B offers 198.1K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. Gemma 3 27B is $59.70 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
3 months newer
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($59.70 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input:$20.00
Output:$40.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 9 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:56.4%(+12.2%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:44.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Novita
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:56.4%(+12.2%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:44.2%
Providers:1