+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 27B vs GLM-4.5V
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B offers 65.5K more tokens in context window than GLM-4.5V. Gemma 3 27B is $2.50 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5V was developed as a vision-language variant, designed to understand and reason about both images and text in Chinese and English. Built to extend Zhipu AI's multilingual capabilities into multimodal applications, it enables visual understanding alongside bilingual language processing.
5 months newer
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
GLM-4.5V
Zhipu AI
2025-08-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($2.50 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Novita
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2