Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 44.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B offers 241.7K more tokens in context window than GPT-3.5 Turbo. Gemma 3 27B is $1.70 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemma 3 27B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.4% across 26 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.9%), IFEval (90.4%), MATH (89.0%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo is a language model developed by OpenAI. The model shows competitive results across 8 benchmarks. Notable strengths include DROP (70.2%), MMLU (69.8%), HumanEval (68.0%). The model is available through 2 API providers.
1 year newer
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Gemma 3 27B
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 31 common benchmarks
Gemma 3 27B
GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
Available providers and their performance metrics
Gemma 3 27B
DeepInfra
Novita
Gemma 3 27B
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Gemma 3 27B
GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Azure
OpenAI