+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 27B vs GPT-4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 24.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B offers 196.6K more tokens in context window than GPT-4. Gemma 3 27B is $89.70 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 was created as a large multimodal model capable of accepting image and text inputs while producing text outputs. Developed to exhibit human-level performance on various professional and academic benchmarks, it marked a significant advancement in reliability, creativity, and handling of nuanced instructions compared to its predecessors.
1 year newer
GPT-4
OpenAI
2023-06-13
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($89.70 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Input:$30.00
Output:$60.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:73.1%(+24.8%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Average Score:48.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4
2022-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Novita
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:73.1%(+24.8%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Avg Score:48.2%
Providers:2