+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 27B vs GPT-4.1 nano
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 17.3% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 nano offers 818.2K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 27B. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.4% across 26 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.9%), IFEval (90.4%), MATH (89.0%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 nano is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. The model shows competitive results across 25 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (80.1%), IFEval (74.5%), CharXiv-D (73.9%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI
2025-04-14
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($0.20 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 49 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:34.7%(+17.3%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Average Score:17.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1 nano
2024-05-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Novita
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:34.7%(+17.3%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Avg Score:17.4%
Providers:1