+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 27B vs GPT-4o
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o leads with 11.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B offers 117.8K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o. Gemma 3 27B is $12.20 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GPT-4o is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
7 months newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($12.20 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:65.6%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:76.7%(+11.0%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Novita
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:65.6%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:76.7%(+11.0%)
Providers:2