Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 35.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B offers 117.8K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o mini. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemma 3 27B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.4% across 26 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.9%), IFEval (90.4%), MATH (89.0%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.5% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (87.2%), MGSM (87.0%), MMLU (82.0%). It supports a 144K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
GPT-4o mini
OpenAI
2024-07-18
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Gemma 3 27B
GPT-4o mini
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 32 common benchmarks
Gemma 3 27B
GPT-4o mini
GPT-4o mini
2023-10-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Gemma 3 27B
DeepInfra
Novita
Gemma 3 27B
GPT-4o mini
Gemma 3 27B
GPT-4o mini
GPT-4o mini
Azure