+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 27B vs GPT OSS 120B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT OSS 120B leads with 37.7% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs. GPT OSS 120B is available on 5 providers. Overall, GPT OSS 120B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-OSS 120B was developed as an open-source model release from OpenAI, designed to provide the research and developer community with access to a capable language model. Built with 120 billion parameters, it enables experimentation, fine-tuning, and deployment in contexts where open-source licensing and transparency are valued.
4 months newer
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($0.24 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Input:$0.09
Output:$0.45
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:42.4%
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Average Score:80.1%(+37.7%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Novita
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:42.4%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Avg Score:80.1%(+37.7%)
Providers:5