Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 39.7% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs. GPT OSS 120B is available on 5 providers. Overall, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemma 3 27B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.4% across 26 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.9%), IFEval (90.4%), MATH (89.0%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.7% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (90.0%), CodeForces (87.4%), GPQA (80.1%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Gemma 3 27B
GPT OSS 120B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 32 common benchmarks
Gemma 3 27B
GPT OSS 120B
Available providers and their performance metrics
Gemma 3 27B
DeepInfra
Novita
Gemma 3 27B
GPT OSS 120B
Gemma 3 27B
GPT OSS 120B
GPT OSS 120B
DeepInfra
Groq
Novita
OpenAI
ZeroEval