+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 27B vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 11.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct was created as the instruction-tuned version of the Granite base model, designed to follow instructions reliably in enterprise settings. Built to serve business applications requiring dependable language understanding, it provides IBM's accessible interface for enterprise AI.
1 month newer
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
IBM
2025-04-16
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:90.4%(+11.8%)
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Average Score:78.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
2024-04-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Novita
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:90.4%(+11.8%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Avg Score:78.6%
Providers:0