+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 27B vs Grok-2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 leads with 3.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B offers 126.1K more tokens in context window than Grok-2. Gemma 3 27B is $11.70 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 was developed as the second generation of xAI's language model family, designed to provide enhanced reasoning, knowledge, and conversational abilities. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in xAI's model capabilities.
7 months newer
Grok-2
xAI
2024-08-13
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($11.70 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Input:$2.00
Output:$10.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:74.7%
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Average Score:77.9%(+3.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Novita
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:74.7%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Avg Score:77.9%(+3.3%)
Providers:1