+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 27B vs Grok-3
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 leads with 46.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B offers 126.1K more tokens in context window than Grok-3. Gemma 3 27B is $17.70 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Grok-3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 was introduced as xAI's third-generation flagship model, designed to push the boundaries of reasoning, factual accuracy, and helpful assistance. Built to advance the state of AI capabilities, it incorporates improvements across language understanding, generation, and analytical thinking.
23 days newer
Grok-3
xAI
2025-02-17
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($17.70 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:36.0%
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Average Score:82.0%(+46.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-3
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Novita
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:36.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Avg Score:82.0%(+46.0%)
Providers:1