Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 60.4% higher average benchmark score. Grok Code Fast 1 offers 3.9K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 27B. Gemma 3 27B is $1.40 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemma 3 27B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.4% across 26 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.9%), IFEval (90.4%), MATH (89.0%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1 is a language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.8% across 1 benchmarks. Notable strengths include SWE-Bench Verified (70.8%). It supports a 266K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
2025-08-28
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Gemma 3 27B
Grok Code Fast 1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 27 common benchmarks
Gemma 3 27B
Grok Code Fast 1
Available providers and their performance metrics
Gemma 3 27B
DeepInfra
Novita
Gemma 3 27B
Grok Code Fast 1
Gemma 3 27B
Grok Code Fast 1
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI