+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 27B vs Kimi K2 0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 0905 leads with 13.8% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 0905 offers 262.1K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 27B. Gemma 3 27B is $2.80 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi K2 0905 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 was introduced as the second generation of Moonshot's language model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities across language understanding and generation. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in Moonshot's model offerings.
5 months newer
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
Kimi K2 0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($2.80 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:71.7%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Average Score:85.5%(+13.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Novita
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:71.7%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Avg Score:85.5%(+13.8%)
Providers:2