+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 27B vs Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 leads with 18.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs. Gemma 3 27B is available on 2 providers. Overall, Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct-0905 represents a specific release iteration of the K2 Instruct model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements. Built to provide enhanced instruction-following based on deployment feedback, it continues the evolution of Moonshot's instruction-tuned offerings.
5 months newer
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:48.0%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Average Score:66.1%(+18.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Novita
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:48.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Avg Score:66.1%(+18.1%)
Providers:0