+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 27B vs Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Both models show comparable benchmark performance. Gemma 3 27B offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.1 405B Instruct. Gemma 3 27B is $1.48 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is available on 8 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 405B was developed as Meta's largest open-source language model, designed to provide frontier-level capabilities with 405 billion parameters. Built to demonstrate that open-source models can match proprietary systems in capability, it enables researchers and developers to experiment with and deploy a powerful foundation model without licensing restrictions.
7 months newer
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($1.48 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Input:$0.89
Output:$0.89
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:78.8%(+0.1%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Average Score:78.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Novita
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:78.8%(+0.1%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Avg Score:78.7%
Providers:8