+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 27B vs Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 31.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available on 6 providers. Overall, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.4% across 26 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.9%), IFEval (90.4%), MATH (89.0%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2D (91.1%), DocVQA (88.4%), ChartQA (83.4%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 6 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.05($0.20 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 32 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:53.2%(+31.3%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Average Score:21.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Novita
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:53.2%(+31.3%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Avg Score:21.9%
Providers:6