+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 27B vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 8.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base represents an updated iteration of the 24B foundation model, developed with architectural refinements and improved training. Built to provide enhanced base capabilities for fine-tuning, it incorporates learnings from previous versions for better downstream performance.
5 days newer
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($0.10 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:54.9%(+8.2%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Average Score:46.8%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Novita
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:54.9%(+8.2%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Avg Score:46.8%
Providers:1