+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 27B vs Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Nemotron Nano 9B v2 leads with 21.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs. Gemma 3 27B is available on 2 providers. Overall, Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 77.0% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.8%), IFEval (90.3%), AIME 2025 (72.1%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
NVIDIA
2025-08-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:54.2%
+
+
+
+
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Average Score:75.1%(+21.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
2024-09
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Novita
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:54.2%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Avg Score:75.1%(+21.0%)
Providers:0