+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 27B vs o3
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3 leads with 40.9% higher average benchmark score. o3 offers 37.9K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 27B. Gemma 3 27B is $9.70 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, o3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3 represents the next generation in OpenAI's reasoning model series, developed to advance the capabilities of deliberate, step-by-step problem solving. Built to handle increasingly complex challenges across mathematics, science, and coding, it continues the evolution of reasoning-focused AI with improved analytical depth and accuracy.
1 month newer
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
o3
OpenAI
2025-04-16
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($9.70 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o3
Input:$2.00
Output:$8.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:42.4%
+
+
+
+
o3
Average Score:83.3%(+40.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3
2024-05-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Novita
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:42.4%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
o3
Avg Score:83.3%(+40.9%)
Providers:1