Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 19.8% higher average benchmark score. o4-mini offers 37.9K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 27B. Gemma 3 27B is $5.20 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemma 3 27B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.4% across 26 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.9%), IFEval (90.4%), MATH (89.0%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
o4-mini is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.5% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2024 (93.4%), AIME 2025 (92.7%), MathVista (84.3%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
o4-mini
OpenAI
2025-04-16
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Gemma 3 27B
o4-mini
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 39 common benchmarks
Gemma 3 27B
o4-mini
o4-mini
2024-05-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Gemma 3 27B
DeepInfra
Novita
Gemma 3 27B
o4-mini
Gemma 3 27B
o4-mini
o4-mini
OpenAI