+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 27B vs Pixtral Large
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Pixtral Large leads with 8.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Pixtral Large. Gemma 3 27B is $7.70 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Pixtral Large is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral Large was developed as a larger-scale multimodal model, designed to provide advanced vision-language understanding capabilities. Built to handle complex tasks requiring sophisticated analysis of visual and textual information, it represents Mistral's flagship offering for multimodal applications.
3 months newer
Pixtral Large
Mistral AI
2024-11-18
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($7.70 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Input:$2.00
Output:$6.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:83.0%
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Average Score:91.7%(+8.7%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Novita
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:83.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Avg Score:91.7%(+8.7%)
Providers:1