+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads with 2.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs. Gemma 3 27B is available on 2 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 32B was created as a larger variant in the Qwen 2.5 family, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities with 32 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring stronger reasoning and generation quality, it represents a powerful option for demanding language understanding tasks.
5 months newer
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:76.2%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Average Score:78.3%(+2.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Novita
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:76.2%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Avg Score:78.3%(+2.1%)
Providers:0