+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 5.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Overall, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B was developed as a specialized coding model, designed to excel at programming tasks with 32 billion parameters specifically optimized for code. Built to understand and generate code across multiple programming languages, it serves developers requiring advanced code completion, debugging, and explanation capabilities.
5 months newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input:$0.09
Output:$0.09($0.12 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:74.0%(+5.2%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Average Score:68.8%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Novita
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:74.0%(+5.2%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Avg Score:68.8%
Providers:4