+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct leads with 10.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B is available on 2 providers. Overall, Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 7B was developed as an efficient vision-language model, designed to provide multimodal understanding with minimal computational requirements. Built with 7 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it serves applications requiring practical vision-language capabilities with constrained resources.
1 month newer
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-01-26
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:73.6%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Average Score:83.7%(+10.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Novita
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:73.6%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Avg Score:83.7%(+10.2%)
Providers:0