+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 leads with 17.7% higher average benchmark score. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 offers 124.9K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 27B. Gemma 3 27B is $3.00 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B Thinking was developed as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended thinking capabilities into the large-scale Qwen3 architecture. Built to combine deliberate analytical processing with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves tasks requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
4 months newer
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-07-25
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($3.00 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Input:$0.30
Output:$3.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:66.8%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Average Score:84.4%(+17.7%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Novita
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:66.8%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Avg Score:84.4%(+17.7%)
Providers:1