+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3 32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 32B leads with 36.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Qwen3 32B. Both models have similar pricing. Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen3 32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B was developed as a dense 32-billion-parameter model in the Qwen3 family, designed to provide strong language understanding without mixture-of-experts complexity. Built for applications requiring straightforward deployment and reliable performance, it serves as a capable mid-to-large-scale foundation model.
1 month newer
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
Qwen3 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($0.10 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:29.7%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Average Score:65.7%(+36.0%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Novita
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:29.7%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Avg Score:65.7%(+36.0%)
Providers:3