+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 16.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B offers 131.1K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Gemma 3 27B is $1.35 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
6 months newer
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($1.35 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Input:$0.15
Output:$1.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:66.8%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Average Score:82.9%(+16.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Novita
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:66.8%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Avg Score:82.9%(+16.2%)
Providers:1