+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 4B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 4B leads with 6.5% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemma 3 4B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental version optimized for LiteRT deployment, designed to push the boundaries of on-device AI. Built to demonstrate the potential of running instruction-tuned models on mobile and edge devices, it represents ongoing efforts to make AI more accessible across hardware platforms.
2 months newer
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 10 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Average Score:44.3%(+6.5%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Average Score:37.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2024-06-01
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Avg Score:44.3%(+6.5%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Avg Score:37.8%
Providers:0