+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 4B vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed leads with 3.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 4B offers 198.1K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. Gemma 3 4B is $59.94 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
3 months newer
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Input:$0.02
Output:$0.04($59.94 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input:$20.00
Output:$40.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 9 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Average Score:41.2%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:44.2%(+3.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Avg Score:41.2%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:44.2%(+3.0%)
Providers:1