+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 4B vs GPT-3.5 Turbo
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 4B leads with 11.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 4B offers 241.7K more tokens in context window than GPT-3.5 Turbo. Gemma 3 4B is $1.94 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 3 4B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo was developed as an optimized version of GPT-3.5, designed to provide a balance of capability and efficiency for conversational and completion tasks. Built to serve as a cost-effective option for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it became widely adopted for chatbots, content generation, and general-purpose AI assistance.
1 year newer
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Input:$0.02
Output:$0.04($1.94 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Input:$0.50
Output:$1.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Average Score:59.2%(+11.9%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Average Score:47.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Avg Score:59.2%(+11.9%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Avg Score:47.3%
Providers:2