+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 4B vs GPT-4 Turbo
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4 Turbo leads with 10.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 4B offers 130.0K more tokens in context window than GPT-4 Turbo. Gemma 3 4B is $39.94 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4 Turbo is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo was introduced as an optimized version of GPT-4, designed to provide enhanced performance with improved efficiency and an expanded context window. Built with updated knowledge and refined capabilities, it offered developers a more cost-effective way to leverage GPT-4's advanced reasoning while handling longer conversations and documents.
11 months newer
GPT-4 Turbo
OpenAI
2024-04-09
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Input:$0.02
Output:$0.04($39.94 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Input:$10.00
Output:$30.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Average Score:59.2%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Average Score:69.2%(+10.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4 Turbo
2023-12-31
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Avg Score:59.2%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Avg Score:69.2%(+10.0%)
Providers:2