+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 4B vs GPT-4o mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o mini leads with 6.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 4B offers 117.8K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o mini. Gemma 3 4B is $0.69 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GPT-4o mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4o Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4o, designed to bring multimodal capabilities to applications requiring faster response times and lower costs. Built to democratize access to advanced vision and text understanding, it enables developers to build sophisticated applications with reduced resource requirements.
7 months newer
GPT-4o mini
OpenAI
2024-07-18
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Input:$0.02
Output:$0.04($0.69 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.60
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Average Score:59.2%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Average Score:65.9%(+6.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4o mini
2023-10-01
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Avg Score:59.2%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Avg Score:65.9%(+6.6%)
Providers:1