+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 4B vs Granite 3.3 8B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 4B leads with 7.6% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemma 3 4B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base was developed by IBM as an enterprise-focused foundation model, designed to provide a reliable starting point for business applications. Built with 8 billion parameters and trained on curated data, it serves as a foundation for domain-specific customization in enterprise contexts.
1 month newer
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
Granite 3.3 8B Base
IBM
2025-04-16
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Average Score:80.7%(+7.6%)
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Average Score:73.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Base
2024-04-01
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Avg Score:80.7%(+7.6%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Avg Score:73.2%
Providers:0