+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 4B vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 4B leads with 12.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 3 4B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was introduced as an experimental ultra-compact model, designed to demonstrate IBM's progress in efficient model development. Built to explore the boundaries of what small models can achieve for enterprise applications, it represents an early look at next-generation Granite capabilities.
1 month newer
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
2025-05-02
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Average Score:80.7%(+12.9%)
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Average Score:67.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Avg Score:80.7%(+12.9%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Avg Score:67.8%
Providers:0