+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 4B vs Grok-3 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 Mini leads with 60.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 4B offers 126.1K more tokens in context window than Grok-3 Mini. Gemma 3 4B is $0.74 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Grok-3 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 Mini was developed as an efficient version of Grok 3, designed to bring next-generation capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide strong performance with practical efficiency, it extends Grok 3's innovations to broader application scenarios.
23 days newer
Grok-3 Mini
xAI
2025-02-17
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Input:$0.02
Output:$0.04($0.74 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Input:$0.30
Output:$0.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Average Score:21.7%
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Average Score:82.2%(+60.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
Grok-3 Mini
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Avg Score:21.7%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Avg Score:82.2%(+60.5%)
Providers:1