+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 4B vs Kimi K2 Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Instruct leads with 23.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 4B is $2.81 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi K2 Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Kimi K2, designed to follow user instructions reliably across diverse tasks. Built to serve general-purpose conversational and task-completion applications, it provides Moonshot's accessible interface for language AI.
4 months newer
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Input:$0.02
Output:$0.04($2.81 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Input:$0.57
Output:$2.30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Average Score:54.9%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Average Score:77.9%(+23.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Avg Score:54.9%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Avg Score:77.9%(+23.1%)
Providers:1