Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct leads with 13.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 4B offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B was introduced with refinements to the Llama 3 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in instruction-following and task performance. Built to continue the evolution of Meta's 70B tier, it provides enhanced quality while maintaining the deployment characteristics valued by the open-source community.
3 months newer

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06

Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemma 3 4B

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks

Gemma 3 4B

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemma 3 4B
DeepInfra

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Gemma 3 4B

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Gemma 3 4B

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together