+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 4B vs Llama 4 Maverick
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Maverick leads with 20.9% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Maverick offers 1.7M more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 4B. Gemma 3 4B is $0.71 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Maverick is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick was developed as a variant in Meta's fourth-generation language model family, designed to explore specialized capabilities and training approaches. Built to push the boundaries of open-source model development, it represents experimentation with advanced techniques in the Llama lineage.
24 days newer
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Input:$0.02
Output:$0.04($0.71 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Input:$0.17
Output:$0.60
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Average Score:52.9%
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Average Score:73.8%(+20.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Avg Score:52.9%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:73.8%(+20.9%)
Providers:7