+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 4B vs Mistral Large 2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Large 2 leads with 12.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 4B offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Mistral Large 2. Gemma 3 4B is $7.94 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Mistral Large 2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 2 was introduced as the second generation of Mistral's flagship model, designed to provide frontier-level capabilities across diverse language tasks. Built with enhanced reasoning, coding, and multilingual abilities, it represents Mistral's most advanced offering for enterprise and demanding applications.
7 months newer
Mistral Large 2
Mistral AI
2024-07-24
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Input:$0.02
Output:$0.04($7.94 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
Input:$2.00
Output:$6.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Average Score:80.3%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
Average Score:92.5%(+12.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Avg Score:80.3%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
Avg Score:92.5%(+12.3%)
Providers:2