Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct leads with 8.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 4B offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Phi-3.5-mini-instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemma 3 4B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 26 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (90.2%), GSM8k (89.2%), DocVQA (75.8%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is a language model developed by Microsoft. The model shows competitive results across 31 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (86.2%), ARC-C (84.6%), RULER (84.1%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Gemma 3 4B
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 50 common benchmarks
Gemma 3 4B
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Gemma 3 4B
DeepInfra
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Gemma 3 4B
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Gemma 3 4B
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Azure