+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads with 12.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 14B was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability and efficiency for diverse language tasks. Built with 14 billion parameters, it provides strong performance for applications requiring reliable instruction-following without the resource demands of larger models.
5 months newer
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Average Score:62.3%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Average Score:74.9%(+12.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Avg Score:62.3%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Avg Score:74.9%(+12.6%)
Providers:0