+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen2 72B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2 72B Instruct leads with 8.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen2 72B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 72B was developed as the flagship model in the Qwen2 generation, designed to provide advanced language understanding with 72 billion parameters. Built to deliver strong performance across diverse tasks, it represented a significant advancement in Qwen's model capabilities when introduced.
7 months newer
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-07-23
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Average Score:62.3%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Average Score:70.6%(+8.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2 72B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Avg Score:62.3%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Avg Score:70.6%(+8.4%)
Providers:0