Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 leads with 29.6% higher average benchmark score. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 offers 124.9K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 4B. Gemma 3 4B is $3.24 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B Thinking was developed as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended thinking capabilities into the large-scale Qwen3 architecture. Built to combine deliberate analytical processing with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves tasks requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
4 months newer

Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-07-25
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemma 3 4B

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Gemma 3 4B

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemma 3 4B
DeepInfra

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Gemma 3 4B

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Gemma 3 4B

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Novita