+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen3 32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 32B leads with 53.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 4B offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Qwen3 32B. Both models have similar pricing. Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs. Qwen3 32B is available on 3 providers. Overall, Qwen3 32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B was developed as a dense 32-billion-parameter model in the Qwen3 family, designed to provide strong language understanding without mixture-of-experts complexity. Built for applications requiring straightforward deployment and reliable performance, it serves as a capable mid-to-large-scale foundation model.
1 month newer
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
Qwen3 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Input:$0.02
Output:$0.04($0.34 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Average Score:12.6%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Average Score:65.7%(+53.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Avg Score:12.6%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Avg Score:65.7%(+53.1%)
Providers:3