+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Gemma 3n E4B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3n E4B leads with 6.0% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemma 3n E4B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental version optimized for LiteRT deployment, designed to push the boundaries of on-device AI. Built to demonstrate the potential of running instruction-tuned models on mobile and edge devices, it represents ongoing efforts to make AI more accessible across hardware platforms.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B was developed as a slightly larger edge-optimized variant, designed to provide enhanced capabilities while still fitting within edge computing constraints. Built to serve applications that can accommodate more parameters for improved quality, it expands the range of edge deployment options.
1 month newer
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2025-05-20
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 11 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Average Score:58.6%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:64.6%(+6.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2024-06-01
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Avg Score:58.6%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:64.6%(+6.0%)
Providers:0