+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed leads with 8.0% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental version optimized for LiteRT deployment, designed to push the boundaries of on-device AI. Built to demonstrate the potential of running instruction-tuned models on mobile and edge devices, it represents ongoing efforts to make AI more accessible across hardware platforms.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
1 month newer
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2025-05-20
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 17 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Average Score:34.4%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:42.4%(+8.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2024-06-01
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Avg Score:34.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:42.4%(+8.0%)
Providers:1